Create Interfaces in which basic Room-operations are defined #2

New issue

Closed

opened 2022-04-28 20:03:37 +02:00 by Dutch · 1 comment

Dutch commented

2022-04-28 20:03:37 +02:00

Owner

Create the following Interfaces and let them be automatically implemented when detected on a DaoEx-Class

IInsert<T>
1. insertAwait(entity: T): Long
2. insertWithJoinsAwait(entity: T, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long
3. insertWithJoinsAwait(entity: T, vararg fields: String, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long
IRead<T>
1. getByIdAwait(id: Long): T?
2. getByIdWithChildrenAwait(id: Long, vararg fields: String): T?
IUpdate<T>
1. updateAwait(entity: T): Long
2. updateWithChildrenAwait(entity: T, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long
3. updateWithChildrenAwait(entity: T, vararg fields: String, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long
IDelete<T>
1. deleteAwait(entity: T): Long
2. deleteWithJoinsAwait(entity: T, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long
3. deleteWithJoinsAwait(entity: T, vararg fields: String, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long

Create the following Interfaces and let them be automatically implemented when detected on a DaoEx-Class - [x] **IInsert\<T>** 1. insertAwait(entity: T): Long 2. insertWithJoinsAwait(entity: T, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long 3. insertWithJoinsAwait(entity: T, vararg fields: String, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long - [x] **IRead\<T>** 1. getByIdAwait(id: Long): T? 2. getByIdWithChildrenAwait(id: Long, vararg fields: String): T? - [x] **IUpdate\<T>** 1. updateAwait(entity: T): Long 2. updateWithChildrenAwait(entity: T, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long 3. updateWithChildrenAwait(entity: T, vararg fields: String, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long - [x] **IDelete\<T>** 1. deleteAwait(entity: T): Long 2. deleteWithJoinsAwait(entity: T, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long 3. deleteWithJoinsAwait(entity: T, vararg fields: String, removeIfNull: Boolean = false): Long

Dutch referenced this issue

2022-04-28 20:19:33 +02:00

Automatically create DaoEx-classes #3

Dutch added this to the Release v1.0 project

2022-12-20 18:08:34 +01:00

Dutch commented

2022-12-20 18:09:48 +01:00

Author

Owner

~~Todo: Check if needed. It would probably be easier/better to simply include all the methods in the base dao as protected.~~

This would come really handy with the automatical generation of DaoEx-classes

~~Todo: Check if needed. It would probably be easier/better to simply include all the methods in the base dao as protected.~~ This would come really handy with the automatical generation of DaoEx-classes

Dutch self-assigned this

2022-12-20 18:23:59 +01:00

Dutch added this to the v1.0 milestone

2022-12-20 18:41:52 +01:00

Dutch referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2023-01-03 11:55:43 +01:00

feature/#2_room_interfaces #21

Dutch closed this issue

2023-01-03 11:56:13 +01:00

Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.